Showing posts with label SEO Tips. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SEO Tips. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Google: Stop Repeating The Same Keyword Over & Over Again


Google Webmaster Help thread has one webmaster asking why Google isn't ranking his seven year old web site.
Google's John Mueller said that he is over doing it with the web site.
twins
John explained that he is repeating the same keyword over and over again, to the point where it is making it hard for Google to "recognize what's really unique & compelling" on that specific site.
John said:
One of the difficulties our algorithms have with your pages is that they appear to be using the same keywords over and over again -- making it hard to recognize what's really unique & compelling on your site. For instance, looking at the cached version of your homepage: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.just-tow.co.uk/&strip=1 - I see over 1000 mentions of "towbar." The same is the case on URLs like http://www.just-tow.co.uk/towbars/honda-tow-bars/honda-civic-towbars.html (where even the URL includes 3 mentions of towbars). Our algorithms are pretty good at recognizing important content on your pages, you don't have to repeat them unnecessarily.
I know a lot of SEOs are obsessed with keyword density, even to this day. Maybe a post like this from Google will help relax some SEOs? Or maybe it will back fire and cause havoc where SEOs start making sure they don't mention the keyword they want to rank for at all on the page. ;-) Just kidding.

Friday, March 15, 2013

Google's Final Manual Panda Refresh Here? #25


All signs are pointing to a Google update being pushed out yesterday afternoon into today. 
Google Panda #25
The speculation across the SEO forums is that this is the Panda refresh we wereexpecting to see this weekend.
Google's Matt Cutts said we should expect to see a refresh of Panda sometime this Friday or Monday. It seems like the Panda update started actually yesterday afternoon and is continuing to propagate throughout now.
The ongoing WebmasterWorld thread has dozens of SEOs and Webmasters claiming rank changes for better or worse. Here are some examples:
Is there an update happening? we're down maybe 40% or so since few hours ago.
Im seeing some movement for my main keyword, go Panda go.
I'm seeing signs of a Panda update here in the UK. Or Panda everflux. That's going to kill the update talk somewhat isn't it...
I've also received several emails and comments about a possible Google Panda update.
Google has not yet confirmed this update, nor do I expect them to confirm it since Matt Cutts also said that the future Panda updates will be more rolling updates.
This may be the last manual Panda refresh we report - Panda #25 - welcome.

Past Google Panda Update:

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.
Google Won't Confirm or Deny: I received word back from Google that since future updates will be rolling updates, Google is unlikely, going forward to confirm or deny Panda refreshes. I have a more detailed story on that over here.

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Google's Cutts: Next Generation Penguin Update Will Be Big



Last night, Google's head of search spam, Matt Cutts announced at SMX West (which I live blogged and reported at Search Engine Land) that a "next generation" of Penguin is coming in 2013.
Google Penguin 4

This one should be big. I specifically asked, what will SEOs be talking about in 2013? What will be the next big Google algorithmic change that is the talk of 2013 amongst SEOs and Webmasters.
Matt did not mention the merchant quality algorithmbut he did specifically say it might be the next generation of the Penguin update.
Matt said his team is currently working on it and this will be a big change to how Penguin works. So when it is released, sometime in 2013, I assume sooner than later, this will send some ripples through the SEO space.
This would technically be named Penguin 4. The last official Penguin release was Penguin 3 on October 5, 2012, which was over 5 months ago. In fact, we only had two updates to Penguin since it's original release on April 24, 2012:
When will Penguin 4 happen? Again, Matt did not say, but if I had to guess, sometime in Q2 2013.
Forum discussion at Google+ and WebmasterWorld.

Beware: Google To Squash Another Link Network Very Soon


Google Link Spam Caught
As I reported last night during live blogging - but things get lost there - Google is going to punish yet another link network in the next week or two.
Which network? I do not know yet, but I am sure that information will surface via the SEO forums when it does happen.
Matt Cutts, Google's head of search spam, announced this last night during his SMX session. He said that in the next week or two, Google will go after yet another link network. He also confirmed they did target alink network a week or so ago, but did not name which network was targeted exactly.
Like I said in the past, I am still surprised webmasters with long term goals for their web sites participate in these networks. Google has continuously gone after link networks in the past, even dating back as early or before 2006.
What can you do to prepare? Well, it is a catch 22. If you remove your link network links, your ranking will decline. If you keep them, Google may penalize the network and your site anyway. Long term - work on adding real links to your site and remove those network links.
Forum discussion at Google+.

8 Weeks Later, Google To Release Panda #25


Filed Under Google PageRank & Algorithm Updates.

As I reported in live blogging last night and on Search Engine Land - Google's Matt Cutts announced a Panda refresh is coming this weekend. Either this Friday, March 15th or this Monday March 18th.

It has been 7 weeks since the last Panda refresh, version 24. So when this actually pushes out, it will be closer to 8 weeks since that last update.
We've speculated a few weeks ago that Google would go on with tradition and release a 4 week update at the end of February but that did not happen.
When it is officially released, we will give you all those details:

Past Google Panda Update:

Forum discussion at Google+ and WebmasterWorld.

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Web Spam Archive Tool Saves Google’s Live Spam For More Than Just Recent Results


One of the more interesting aspects of Google’s recently released “How Search Works” interactive infographic were the live examples of spam that were recently removed. The features allows users to see live spam that was recently removed (once they clicked through the disclaimer that offensive material may be included.)
Just 4 days later our own RustyBrick (the company of our very own Barry Schwartz) has released a Web Spam Archive Replay tool that aggregates and saves the spam examples. Google appears to only provide 48 examples at a time, but this  tool allows users to flip through more than 2222 examples.
Full-Tool
Additionally the Web Spam Archive Replay Tool tool shows the URL marked as spam, the page title, the description snippet and the time removed. RustyBrick’s tool is a free source for those that get their kicks seeing what Google kicks out of it’s index.
Update: Users can also do a search to see if their website has ever showed up in the Google Live Spam Results with the search tool:
Search-tool
For more see the free tool on RustyBrick.

Friday, February 22, 2013

Google Rarely Updates The Penguin Algorithm



It has almost been five months since the last Penguin refresh and no updates to the Penguin algorithm are in sight.

In fact, I reported yesterday at Search Engine Land that No, Google Hasn’t Released Unannounced Penguin Updates. Why did I have to report that? Couple reasons:
(1) There was some speculation based on a video hangout with John Mueller that Penguin refreshed regularly. It does not, it never did, and the truth is, it refreshes very rarely.
(2) It has been almost five months since an official Penguin update and I wanted to make sure we didn't miss any updates.
Google has told us that Penguin is rarely refreshed, unlike Panda and we didn't miss any Penguin refreshes since.
What was John talking about? He was talking about normal link analysis is refreshed and rerun continuously.
I posted this on my Google+ page and then someone brought up the Zebra update. There is no such thing, stop asking me about Zebras. There was not a Zebra update.
Forum discussion at Google+.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Google Panda #25 Coming Today? Not Sure.



An ongoing WebmasterWorld thread has some chatter around an increase in GoogleBot crawl activity as well as some early ranking fluctuations.

That and we are just about the 30 day mark from the previous Google Panda update, Panda #24, we are suspecting a Panda update is about to be hitting today or tomorrow.
Normally, days before a Panda update is announced by Google, we see this type of chatter and GoogleBot activity. The issue is, it has been almost 5 months since the lastconfirmed Penguin update, so webmasters are unsure what is going on with that.
That being said, Mozcast showed some activity the other day, so did SERPs.com, however SERPMetrics doesn't show much, and now DigitalPoint shows changes (See "Search Engine Rank Changes") also but nothing crazy.
Is a Panda refresh about to hit us? I suspect so but only Google can confirm that.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

A Google Penalty Removal Leads To Less Google Traffic?



WebmasterWorld thread has an interesting case I've never seen before.
A webmaster, who is a "senior member" at WebmasterWorld, claims he received a notification that Google revoked a manual penalty they had on his site for a while. Three days after the penalty revocation the traffic from Google "completely" stopped coming in.

It is like he was better off with the manual penalty versus not having the penalty at all.
We know Google does manually revoke partial penalties but this doesn't seem like a partial revocation.
One theory given in the thread is that now the manual penalty was revoked, an automated algorithmic penalty kicked in and made things worse. I am not sure I believe that 100%. I don't think it works that way, but who knows - I don't have that type of knowledge. It just doesn't seem right based on the knowledge I do have.
Netmeg explained his theory in the thread:Is it possible that once the manual action was revoked, one of the algorithmic changes finally kicked in?
Or maybe it is just a temporary glitch and things will fix itself in a few more days?
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

4 Steps to Panda-Proof Your Website (Before It’s Too Late!)


It may be a new year, but that hasn’t stopped Google from rolling out yet another Panda refresh.

Last year Google unleashed the most aggressive campaign of major algo updates ever in its crusade to battle rank spam. This year looks to be more of the same.
Since Panda first hit the scene two years ago, thousands of sites have been mauled. SEO forums are littered with site owners who have seen six figure revenue websites and their entire livelihoods evaporate overnight, largely because they didn’t take Panda seriously.
If your site is guilty of transgressions that might provoke the Panda and you haven’t been hit yet, consider yourself lucky. But understand that it’s only a matter of time before you do get mauled. No doubt about it: Panda is coming for you.
Over the past year, we’ve helped a number of site owners recover from Panda. We’ve also worked with existing clients to Panda-proof their websites and (knock on wood) haven’t had a single site fall victim to Panda.
Based on that what we’ve learned saving and securing sites, I’ve pulled together a list of steps and actions to help site owners Panda-proof websites that may be at risk.

Step 1: Purge Duplicate Content

Duplicate content issues have always plagued websites and SEOs. But with Panda, Google has taken a dramatically different approach to how they view and treat sites with high degrees of duplicate content. Where dupe content issues pre-Panda might hurt a particular piece of content, now duplicate content will sink an entire website.
So with that shift in attitude, site owners need to take duplicate content seriously. You must be hawkish about cleaning up duplicate content issues to Panda-proof your site.
Screaming Frog is a good choice when you want to identify duplicate pages. This article by Ben Goodsell offers a great tutorial on locating duplicate content issues.
Some suggestions for fixing dupe content issues include:
  • Meta directives (e.g. noindex, follow).
  • Canonical tags (rel=“canonical”).
  • 301 redirects.
  • Block pages via Robots.txt file.
  • Remove URLs via Webmaster Tools.
  • Choose your preferred domain in Webmaster Tools.
Now, cleaning up existing duplicate content issues is critical. But it’s just as important to take a preventative measures as well. This means, addressing the root cause of your duplicate content issues before they end up in the index. Yoast offers some great suggestions on how to avoid duplicate content issues altogether.

Step 2: Eradicate Low Quality, Low Value Content

Google’s objective with Panda is to help users find "high-quality" sites by diminishing the visibility (ranking power) of low-quality content, all of which is accomplished at scale, algorithmically. So weeding out low value content should be mission critical for site owners.
But the million dollar question we hear all the time is “what constitutes ‘low quality’ content?”
Google offered guidance on how to asses page-level quality, which is useful to help guide your editorial roadmap. But what about sites that host hundreds or thousands of pages, where evaluating every page by hand isn’t even remotely practical or cost-effective?
A much more realistic approach for larger sites is to look at user engagement signals that Google is potentially using to identify low-quality content. These would include key behavioral metrics such as:
  • Low to no visits.
  • Anemic unique page views.
  • Short time on page.
  • High bounce rates.
Of course, these metrics can be somewhat noisy and susceptible to external factors, but they’re the most efficient way to sniff-out out low value content at scale.
Some ways you can deal with these low value and poor performing pages include:
  • Deleting any content with low to no user engagement signals.
  • Consolidating the content of thin or shallow pages into thicker, more useful documents (i.e., “purge and merge).”
  • Adding additional internal links to improve visitor engagement (and deeper indexation). Tip: make sure these internal links point to high-quality content on your site.
One additional type of low quality content that often gets overlooked is pagination. Proper pagination is highly effective at distributing link equity throughout your site. But high ratios of paginated archives, comments and tag pages can also dilute your site’s crawl budget, cause indexation cap issues and negatively tip the scales of high-to low-value content ratios on your site.
Tips for Panda-proofing pagination include:
  • “No index, follow” paginated pages.
  • Tag paginated content with “rel=prev” and “rel=next” to indicate documents in a sequence.

Step 3: Thicken-Up Thin Content

Google hates thin content. And this disdain isn’t reserved for spammy scraper sites or thin affiliates only. It’s also directed at sites with little or no original content (i.e., another form of “low value” content).
One of the riskiest content types we see frequently on client sites are thin directory-style pages. These are aggregate feed pages you’d find on ecommerce product pages (both page level and category level); sites with city, state and ZIP code directory type pages (think hotel and travel sites); and event location listings (think ticket brokers). And many sites host thousands of these page types, which other than a big list of hyperlinks have zero-to-no content.
Unlike other low-value content traps, these directory pages are often instrumental in site usabilityand helping users navigate to deeper content. So deleting them or merging them isn’t an option.
Instead, the best strategy here is to thicken up these thin directory pages with original content. Some recommendations include:
  • Drop a thousand words of original, value-add content on the page in an effort to treat each page as a comprehensive guide on a specific topic.
  • Pipe in API data and content mash-ups (excellent when you need to thicken hundreds or thousands of pages at scale).
  • Encourage user reviews.
  • Add images and videos.
  • Move thin pages off to subdomains, which Google hints at. Though we use this is as more of a “stop gap” approach for sites that have been mauled by Panda and are trying to rebound quickly, rather than a long-term, sustainable strategy.
It’s worth noting that these recommendations can be applied to most types of thin content pages. I’m just using directory style pages as an example because we see them so often.
When it comes to discovering thin content issues at scale, take a look at word count. If you’re running WordPress, there are a couple of plugins you can use to asses word count for every document on your site:
  • WP Word Count
  • Admin Word Count Column
As well, here are some all-purpose plugin recommendations to help in the war against Panda.
All in all, we’re seeing documents that have been thickened up get a nice boost in rankings and SERP visibility. And this isn’t boost isn’t a temporal QDF bump. In the majority of cases, when thickening up thin pages, we’re seeing permanent ranking improvements over competitor pages.

Step 4: Develop High-Quality Content

On the flipside of fixing low or no-value content issues, you must adopt an approach of onlypublishing the highest quality content on your site. For many sites, this is a total shift in mindset, but nonetheless raising your content publishing standards is essential to Panda-proofing your site.
Google describes “quality content” as “content that you can send to your child to learn something.” Which is a little vague but to me it says two distinct things:
  • Your content should be highly informative.
  • Your content should easy to understand (easy enough that a child can comprehend it).
For a really in-depth look at “What Google Considers Quality Content,” check out Brian Ussery’s excellent analysis.
When publishing content on our own sites, we ask ourselves a few simple quality control questions:
  • Does this content offer value?
  • Is this content you would share with others?
  • Would you link to this content as an informative resource?
If a piece of content doesn’t meet these basic criteria, we work to improve it until it does.
Now, when it comes to publishing quality content, many site owners don’t have the good fortune of having industry experts in house and internal writing resources at their disposal. In those cases, you should consider outsourcing your content generation to the pros.
Some of the most effective ways we use to find professional, authoritative authors include:
  • Placing an ad on Craigslist and conduct a “competition.” Despite what the critics say, this method works really and you can find some excellent, cost-effective talent.  “How to Find Quality Freelance Authors on Craigslist” will walk you through the process.
  • Reaching out to influential writers in your niche with columns on high profile pubs. Most of these folks do freelance work and are eager to take on new projects. You can find these folks with search operators like [intitle:“your product nice” intext:“meet our bloggers”] or [intitle:“your product nice” intext: “meet our authors”] since many blogs publish an author’s profile page.
  • Targeting published authors on Amazon.com is a fantastic way to find influential authors who have experience writing on topics in your niche.
Apart from addressing writing resource deficiencies, the advantages of hiring topic experts or published authors include:
  • Authoritative authors raise the perceived value of your content.
  • You can leverage authorship credentials on Google+.
  • Author profiles display in the SERP snippets, and can improve CTR and help users find great content.
  • AuthorRank! It may not be a ranking signal just yet, but it will be.
  • Authorship engagement and satisfaction which may contribute to AuthorRank.
  • Higher engagement levels lead to longer clicks vs the short clicks. And I have to assume “time on page/site” is a signal Google pays attention to.
Finally, I wanted to address the issue of frequency and publishing quality content. Ask yourself this: are you publishing content everyday on your blog, sometimes twice a day? If so, ask yourself “why?”
Is it because you read on a popular marketing blog that cranking out blog posts each and every day is a good way to target trending topics and popular terms, and flood the index with content that will rank in hundreds of relevant mid-tail verticals?
If this is your approach, you might want to rethink it. In fact, I’d argue that 90 percent of sites that use this strategy should slow down and publish better, longer, meatier content less frequently.
In a race to “publish every day!!!” you’re potentially polluting the SERPs with quick, thin, low value posts and dragging down the overall quality score of your entire site. So if you fall into this camp, definitely stop and think about your approach. Test the efficacy of fewer, thicker posts vs short-form “keyword chasing” articles.

Panda-Proofing Wrap Up

Bottom line: get your site in-shape before it’s too late. Why risk being susceptible to every Panda update, when Armageddon is entirely avoidable.
The SEO and affiliate forums are littered with site owners who continue to practice the same low value tactics in spite of the clear dangers because they were cheap and they worked. But look at those sites now. Don’t make the same mistake. More details here: http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2241400/4-Steps-to-Panda-Proof-Your-Website-Before-Its-Too-Late

Fewer Links to Your Site In Google Webmaster Tools? You're Not Alone.


Over the past 20 hours or so, there have been numerous reports and concerns over the number of links being reported within Google Webmaster Tools "Links to Your Site" section severely dropping.
The number of links being reported in that section for many webmasters have dropped by as much as 75% for some webmasters.

There are threads at Webmaster World and many at Google Webmaster Help forums about the decline in the number of reported links.
One webmaster said:
I'm seeing a huge shift in what's being reported by the "Links to your Site" page across all the domains in my WMT account.
Something like 50-75% of Links that still exist and were previously reported are now gone.
Others are freaking out:
Where my all back link gone while I didn’t use “disavow links” tool????
In short, do not worry, it is probably a reporting glitch. It wouldn't be the first time. Google had a similar issue back in August 2011.
So do not worry, you have company.
Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld and Google Webmaster Help. Here is the more information - http://www.seroundtable.com/google-webmaster-tools-link-count-16315.html

How to make sure your content gets links


A lot of the SEO industry has embraced content marketing heavily over the last twelve months.
I'd like to say there is no connection with the Penguin update reducing the effectiveness of some low quality ways of getting links, but I think it did have a lot to do with it!

The funny thing is that content marketing has been around for a very, very long time. There are many people out there who are far better at it than many of the SEOs who are now embracing it, so we're playing catchup and trying to find the best route towards using content to get good results for our clients.
This is quite tough and we're going to make mistakes along the way, some content will fly, some won't. The goal for many SEOs is links and social shares and if a piece of content isn't quite right, it may not get either of these.
We need to try and reduce the risk of content not being well received by putting some hard work into the process for content creation. Therefore trying to anticipate potential problems as early as possible. This is what I'll discuss shortly and give some hands-on tips for.
Before we get into that though, I want to briefly discuss how SEOs think of content.

Content as an business asset


When you start thinking of a piece of content as an asset to your business, it puts a whole new perspective on things and importantly, the work you put into creating it. It is no longer a throw away piece of content that is there "just for links".
Instead, you're trying to create something that your client will be proud of and their competitors will be envious of.
You want to aim to create a piece of content where a competitor looks at it and says "Wow, I wish we'd thought of that."
Thinking of content as a proper asset can help towards this and make it mean more. 
There are other benefits too:
  • The asset isn't just for links, it can be useful for PR and social activity too which makes it a lot easier to get sign-off for.
  • It is less likely to be a one-off piece of link building activity and more likely to be something that has the ability to get links for a long time.
  • You're more likely to build content that is relevant to your client's customers which means that the benefit goes far beyond the links you get.
Hopefully you can see the benefits too. But what about the process for doing this?

Process for content creation

The words processes and systems can strike fear into the heart of some people because of negative experiences with them. If you're one of those people, I'd encourage you to take a look at this post on processes.
Hat tip to Will for showing me this. Not all processes are bad and when they're used in the right context, they can help protect against failure.
I want to share a simple set of questions and techniques that should help you produce content that attracts links and social shares.

Who will care about this content?

This is a tough question to ask, but answering it honestly can help ensure that you don't spend valuable time and resources on a piece of content that no one cares about.
Ask yourself who would read the content, who would relate to it and go and find them online to make sure there is an active community of interested people.
It is important to find an active community, otherwise you're probably not going to have many people who have the ability to link and hardly anyone to outreach to. This pretty much ruins your chances of getting links and social shares before you've even started.
Make sure that you expand this question beyond your team at the very least because sometimes, your team (and you) can be a little too emotionally invested in a piece of content which means that you're not the best person to judge how good it could be.
We're also very protective of our own ideas and want to see them through. So it is worth putting emotion and ego to one side in order to make sure that it isn't just you that loves the idea!

Why will someone care about this content?

Another tough question, but this is equally important and as we'll see, can help massively with your outreach if you decide to proceed with the idea.
There are any number of reasons that someone may care about a piece of content, here are a few:
  • It's funny.
  • It's informative.
  • It's useful.
  • It challenges the status quo.
  • It answers a question.
Ultimately, a piece of content needs to trigger some kind of emotional response in order to make people care about it. Otherwise, the content will be opened and forgotten about very quickly, losing all chance of getting links and social shares.
This is another check that can make sure that a piece of content stands a good chance of getting links because it can be hard enough to get people to read content, let alone link to it. So if we can make them care about it, we stand much more chance of getting them to take the time to link to it.
Linking to something take a bit of time and effort so we need to make sure we're making each reader care enough to take the time to link.
In terms of helping with outreach, this step can help us too. When we craft an outreach email, we try to connect with the person we're contacting and make them care about what we're showing them. If we already know why someone would care, then we can work this into our outreach email and be confident that we will get some good responses.

Who will link to or share this content?

This is a super quick one that you can do when you first get an idea for a piece of content. When you first get an idea that you feel is quite solid, go and find ten people that you think would link to it - in ten minutes. If you can't find ten people in ten minutes, is it really such a good idea? 
It also doesn't bode well for finding lots of other link prospects if you can't find just ten. It sounds like a harsh test, but it can really help weed out a good idea from a truly great idea.

Would the CEO be proud of this content?

This questions helps to keep yourself in check on a couple of fronts:
  • It keeps the content on brand and in line with beliefs of the company.
  • It ensures you're creating content that is relevant to the business.
  • It makes you think about creating content that will attract real customers as well as links.
  • If you ever have to present to the CEO on what you've been doing, you can be confident that they won't shoot down your campaigns.
This check is very much needed because we can sometimes focus a bit too heavily on getting links, without thinking about why we're doing it. If we ask ourselves this question, it is no longer 100% about links, it is about creating a great piece of content that is an asset to the business.

Outreach to a handful of external bloggers to get their feedback

If possible, this is a great one that I've used several times.
As mentioned above, we can often be a bit too close to an idea which means we're not able to objectively judge how good it really is. To truly test whether an idea is worthy of attracting links, why not ask the people who you want to link to it? Why not do it before you've even created the content?
It makes perfect sense to speak to bloggers before you finish a piece of content. You can even speak to them before you've even started on a piece of content. Not only are you getting a good sense check against your ideas from knowledgable people, but you're giving them a heads up on something they may want to link to.
So when the content does go live, it is far easier to ask for a link from these bloggers because they have already been involved in the process. They may have even given you a suggestion that you have now incorporated.
You can then go back to them and say how you've taken on board their feedback and created something really cool., this is a great way of building relationships with bloggers. Follow this link for details - http://econsultancy.com/in/blog/61938-how-to-make-sure-your-content-gets-links